January 7, 2013
Arias is standing trial for murdering her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander in 2008 in Mesa, Arizona.
Alexander, a Mormon motivational speaker, ended his 5-month relationship with Arias in 2007, and Alexander’s family says she began stalking him. He reportedly even told them he believed Arias had gotten into his Facebook account somehow.
After he began dating another woman in December 2007, Alexander told family and friends Arias slashed his tires on two separate occasions. Still, despite her alleged behavior, Alexander was reportedly involved in a sexual relationship with Arias in the months prior to his murder.
On June 9th, 2007, after not hearing from their friend in days, two of Alexander’s friends went to his house to check up on him. When they entered they found his body on the floor of his bloody bathroom. It was later determined he had been dead since June 4.
After changing her story a number of times (first she claimed she was not at the home, then said she was present, but saw two people kill Alexander) Arias eventually confessed to killing Alexander but said it was in self-defense, as he was abusive.
Arias has entered a plea of not guilty. If found guilty, she faces the death penalty.
Caution: some of the photos below are graphic.
The trial of Jodi Arias began last week, and the photos of the crime scene were recently shown to the jury.
Above: the last photo of Travis Alexander. It was allegedly taken by Arias just before she shot him in the face and stabbed him 27 times.
Jodi Arias in court Monday during re-direct by the defense. (Photo via Pool Camera)
A lot of time Monday –- too much time, some might argue –- was spent by the defense questioning Jodi Arias about her sexual encounters with ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander.
Anal sex, oral sex, candy in the bedroom, were just some of the subjects covered as Arias was questioned by defense attorney Kurt Nurmi.
After numbering how many times she had anal sex prior to meeting Alexander –- approximately four times –- Arias said the first time Alexander had sex with her she had not asked for it and it hurt.
The defense has been trying to prove that Arias was humiliated and bullied by her ex-boyfriend, whom she is accused of murdering. Her lawyers say she acted in self-defense.
Asked by Nurmi if Alexander had used lubricant, Arias replied: “Not to my knowledge. I think he might’ve spit on his hand … it was painful.”
Nurmi asked Arias if she enjoyed it when Alexander used Tootsie Pops in their sexcapades.
“When he was using the tootsie pops on you, was it physically pleasurable to you?” Nurmi asked.
“There was some physical pleasure I guess. It wasn’t uncomfortable,” Arias replied.
“What other pleasure did you derive from that?” Nurmi asked.
“His attention I guess. It sounds simple, but it was just about us. We shut the door and it was our own space and our time together. So I enjoyed that,” Arias said.
Arias then testified about receiving facials from Alexander during oral sex.
“Sometimes it hurt if it got in my eyes,” she said.
While the sex testimony may have been of interest to some, the momentum in the trial slowed significantly throughout Nurmi’s redirect of last week’s cross-examination.
Arias, 32, is accused of the June 4, 2008 slaying of Alexander inside his Mesa, Ariz., apartment. She faces the death penalty if convicted. Alexander was stabbed 27 times, shot twice in the face and his throat was slashed.
The Jodi Arias case is the latest bizarre murder trial that has generated great media interest and much commentary.
As a criminal defense attorney, I have represented the guilty, the innocent, the innocent (in my opinion) who were found guilty, and the guilty who were found not guilty.
And as a legal analyst, I have opined on numerous cases and predicted verdicts. For example, I always believed — based on the evidence (or lack thereof) – that Casey Anthony would be acquitted of murdering her 3 year old daughter Caylee.
Caylee disappeared between June and July of 2008. In October of 2008, Anthony was indicted for her daughter’s murder even though Caylee was still missing.
It was not until December of 2008, that Caylee’s body was discovered in the woods near her grandparents’ home in Florida. As a result of the delayed discovery, the crime scene provided few clues for investigators. Anthony sat in jail for three years as she prepared for trial; at no point did she ever confess to having anything to do with her daughter’s disappearance, let alone killing her.
Anthony’s trial increased television ratings as analysts speculated about whether or not Antony would (and should) take the stand in her defense. When the opportunity finally came to appear on the stand she instead invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to be a witness against herself — thus avoiding prosecutors’ cross-examination. In July of 2011, a jury found Anthony not guilty.
The Jodi Arias case, while also televised, is vastly different from the Anthony case. I believe Arias should be found guilty of the brutal murder of Travis Alexander for the following four reasons:
1. Evidence at the crime scene: In June of 2008, Travis Alexander’s friends found him dead in his Mesa, Arizona home. By the time Alexander was found, he had been dead for a few days; regardless, investigators were able to obtain and preserve a large amount of physical evidence that placed Arias at the scene of the murder.
• A camera was inside Alexander’s washing machine. Pictures retrieved from its digital card contained nude pictures of Arias on Alexander’s bed, and pictures of Alexander in the shower. These pictures were allegedly taken just moments before Alexander’s murder.
• Arias’s bloody palm print with a piece of her hair was on Alexander’s wall.
• Alexander was stabbed 29 times and shot twice with a .25 caliber pistol and his throat was slashed. In May of 2008, Arias’ grandparents’ .25 caliber gun was stolen during a burglary, which they reported to police.
2. There was a confession: Arias stated she “would never do anything to hurt Travis” during her initial interrogation in July of 2008. Then she asked the investigator, “Are you sure it’s me? Because I wasn’t there.”
• In a subsequent interview, she told investigators that intruders came into Alexander’s home while she was there, murdered him and then threatened to kill her and her family.
• Then, two years later, in 2010, while sitting in jail Arias confessed to investigators that she killed Alexander.
• Arias testified before the jury and subjected herself to intense cross-examination. During her 18 days on the stand, she admitted to previously lying to investigators and also to killing Alexander. It seems that the jury did not buy Arias’ testimony, having submitted the question, Jury: “After all the lies you have told, why should we believe you now?”
3. There is a motive: Arias told her former love interest via instant message that she discovered text messages from other women on Alexander’s phone.
• During the 911 call, Alexander’s friends told the dispatcher that he was having problems with his ex-girlfriend who had stalked him and slashed his tires.
4. Arias’ poor defense: Arias (foolishly) took the stand in her defense and admitted to killing Travis Alexander. She told the jury that she “couldn’t keep her lies straight.” Her testimony seemed staged and she hardly showed emotion as she was asked about Alexander’s killing.
• Arias stated she killed Alexander in self-defense, after a history of his violence. The defense does not have police reports, orders of protection, pictures of an abused Arias, or any evidence whatsoever to support this claim.
• Defense expert Richard Samuels testified that Arias suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). He did not treat Arias for PTSD prior to Alexander’s murder and his initial analysis was based on Arias’ lies.
• Defense witness, Alyce LaViolette, a psychotherapist, stated, “Woman generally say psychological and verbal abuse [is more hurtful] than physical abuse.” LaViolette may be correct; however, again there is no corroboration that Arias was the victim of such abuse – friends, family, coworkers, nor neighbors have stated they witnessed Alexander’s abuse of Arias.
There is no doubt that women suffer physical, sexual, and psychological abuse at the hands of their partners, and that it often does not get reported. In the Jodi Arias case, however, I believe that Arias’ defense will fail, the jury will review the crime scene evidence, her confession, her possible motive and her own poor self-defense and she will be found guilty of murdering Travis Alexander.
Trial observers speculate over guilty verdict, death penalty for Jodi Arias
by Christine LaCroix
Posted on March 13, 2013 at 5:28 PM
Updated Wednesday, Mar 13 at 5:40 PM
PHOENIX — Jodi Arias finished her time on the stand Tuesday afternoon after 18 days of answering questions from her defense attorney, the prosecution, and even the jurors.
Arias is accused of murdering her ex-boyfriend Travis Alexander in 2008.
Now trial observers are starting to speculate on Arias’ fate. Defense attorneys are attempting to demonstrate self defense. Prosecutor Juan Martinez has tried to lay the foundation for pre-meditated, first degree murder, and is seeking the death penalty.
“There is a lot of public perception that an attractive young woman wouldn’t be put to death in Arizona just because there’s jury sympathy,” said attorney Brent Kleinman, who has been closely observing the case.
Katie Wyck has been in the court room since day one of the trial as a spectator. In the early days of the trial, she says she believed that Arias might be found innocent, but says Martinez has since changed her mind.
“He’s doing such a good job. I would not be surprised if Jodi Arias becomes the fourth woman on Arizona’s death row,” Wyck said.
There are currently three women on Arizona’s death row. One of them, Wendi Andriano, was put there by Juan Martinez.
Andriano was sentenced to death for the 2000 murder of her terminally ill husband. Joseph Andriano was poisoned, had his throat slit, and was hit 23 times over the head with a bar stool.
Kleinman says there are some similarities in the Andriano and Arias trials.
“What is similar is both defendants took the stand in their own defense, and both claimed an element of self defense,” said Kleinman.
If Arias were found guilty of first degree murder, Martinez would come back before the jurors during sentencing to prove the murder had aggravating factors worthy of the death penalty.
“The aggravating factor he’s looking at is whether it was an extremely cruel murder,” said Kleinman.
Whether the murder is extremely cruel could depend on which version of the events leading up to Alexander’s murder jurors believe. Alexander was shot, had his throat slit, and was stabbed multiple times, though it is not clear in what order.
“The defense has argued he was shot first,” said Kleinman.
Kleinman says if jurors believe Alexander was shot first, he might not have been aware of the other attacks, and that is a key difference between the Andriano and Arias cases.
“The difference is with the barstool and the poison it is obvious he was aware of what was happening to him,” he said.
This gallery contains 7 photographs in all as photograph etc.