Stereo vs. Joint Stereo **again**

 

 Stereo vs. Joint Stereo **again**

Group: Members
Posts: 1075
Joined: 15-October 03
From: Memphis, TN
Member No.: 9323
QUOTE (mithrandir @ Jan 14 2005, 09:38 AM)
No, joint stereo is lossy.
*

Depends on what you’re talking about. As I understood it, there’s two ways to do Joint Stereo. Mid/Side Stereo is lossless. Intensity Stereo is lossy. But intensity stereo is only used at low bitrates (96k and less) and so Joint Stereo is lossless at normal bitrates used for audio anyway.

So in other words, Joint Stereo can only improve quality by offering another possible data set to compress and giving a possible higher quality. Using Stereo Only makes no sense because that’s just eliminating the possibility of using M/S encoding.

This post has been edited by Otto42: Jan 14 2005, 16:53

——————–

http://ottodestruct.com
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

SirGrey
post Jan 14 2005, 16:53
Post #6
Group: Members
Posts: 241
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 11863
Addenium:
Lots of the confusion goes from Fhg.
They usually call ms stereo as joint stereo and intensity stereo as ms-is stereo. sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Gray_Wolf
post Jan 14 2005, 17:10
Post #7
Group: Banned
Posts: 112
Joined: 19-September 04
Member No.: 17117
This is incredible mad.gifMany people in present moment believe that Lame CBR 192kbps – Stereo mode is the best solution mad.gif sick.gif

This post has been edited by Gray_Wolf: Jan 14 2005, 18:33

Go to the top of the page

One Response to Stereo vs. Joint Stereo **again**

  1. OClRyl Im obliged for the article.Really thank you! Really Cool.